The following perspectives were solicited by citing the Montebello balcony situation and asking which option would have the least effect on sales and property values
|
Views on Special Assessments vs large Condo Fee Increases |
|
|
Realtor |
A realtor/owner would prefer a SA if it is less than $2500 to higher fees. He added that he will probably sell and plans to ask his tenant if he wants to buy his one bedroom unit |
|
Realtor |
Higher condo fees depress the market and reducing buying power. An SA would have no affect on the buyer as it is paid by the seller |
|
Mortgage Broker |
No affect on the buyer. Although disclosed in Condo Doc, under-writers do not read them. Seller pays so no consequences to buyer. Higher condo fees, however, equals less actual buying power as the fee is a part of total allowable monthly payment. |
|
Mortgage Banker |
Would not directly affect purchaser as the debt to to ratio is what lenders use to qualify; not SA’s as they are paid by sellers |
|
Realtor |
Would be more inclined to do a SA than higher fees as condo fee is included as a part of monthly payment. Higher fees will cause buyers to look elsewhere; perhaps where there is no fee such as a fee simple property. |
|
Realtor |
No big deal: other condos have had them and you just pay them and move on. Associations should have in place a financing program with the banks to handle “equity financing” for the owners to facilitate any fees required |
|
Mortgage Banker |
Haven’t given this any thought but don’t believe it would impact a buyer as that is a fee paid by the seller. |
|
Realtor |
Either way it's not going to be pretty considering the current economic situation. I keep going back and forth: increased condo fees vs special assessment? |
|
Realtor |
I prefer taking a stab at the big debt now--just as a homeowner would—so that the community has options in future years and is better positioned in case some other unknown turns up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|